Welcome to TalkStates - Moving, Relocation, City, State Forum
![]() |
Welcome to TalkStates - Moving, Relocation, City, State Forum, like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.
|
| Guest Message © 2010 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
- You cannot reply to this topic
- You cannot reply to this topic
Palin-Obama Comparison Chart
Rate Topic:




#2
Wyody
Posted 04 September 2008 - 01:54 PM
As you can see, the chart jumbles itself up near the bottom and switches to Mrs Obama instead of Mr.
That aside, there are only a couple of useful tidbits there for either side.
This particular issue regards "amount of useful experience".
Again, part of the reason Obama has so much support is because many voters are sick and tired of the same old politicians doing the same old thing so:
Obama's appeal is partly his lack of experience. Makes support of either side of this issue non-relevant in terms of competitive debate.
That aside, there are only a couple of useful tidbits there for either side.
This particular issue regards "amount of useful experience".
Again, part of the reason Obama has so much support is because many voters are sick and tired of the same old politicians doing the same old thing so:
Obama's appeal is partly his lack of experience. Makes support of either side of this issue non-relevant in terms of competitive debate.
winged-feet
#3
catfish
Posted 04 September 2008 - 03:15 PM
You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager
after 143
days of experience.
You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience
of
being a surgeon.
You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after
143
days of experience.
You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143
days of
experience.
You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news
anchor
after 143 days of experience.
BUT....
'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to
the
time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee,
he
logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the
Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work
experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief,
Leader of
the Free World .... 143 days.
We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after
143
days, that's all it is - a start.
AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with
this and
campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work,
yet
some are okay with this for the President of the United States of
America?
Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!
after 143
days of experience.
You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience
of
being a surgeon.
You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after
143
days of experience.
You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143
days of
experience.
You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news
anchor
after 143 days of experience.
BUT....
'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to
the
time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee,
he
logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the
Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work
experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief,
Leader of
the Free World .... 143 days.
We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after
143
days, that's all it is - a start.
AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with
this and
campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work,
yet
some are okay with this for the President of the United States of
America?
Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!
#4
McGowdog
Posted 04 September 2008 - 03:49 PM
Why are we comparing the Republicans' VP's non-experience to the Democrats' Presidential candidate's non-experience?
Is that in case old Johnny kicks the bucket? If that's the case, I'm definitely voting for Sarahcuda the Arctic Fox!
Is that in case old Johnny kicks the bucket? If that's the case, I'm definitely voting for Sarahcuda the Arctic Fox!
On DoubleSecret Probation
#5
Music Junkie
Posted 05 September 2008 - 01:11 PM
McGowdog said:
Why are we comparing the Republicans' VP's non-experience to the Democrats' Presidential candidate's non-experience?
Is that in case old Johnny kicks the bucket? If that's the case, I'm definitely voting for Sarahcuda the Arctic Fox!
Is that in case old Johnny kicks the bucket? If that's the case, I'm definitely voting for Sarahcuda the Arctic Fox!
I agree with you. Obama has NO experience that qualifies him to run for President but seems to have no problem bitching about the little experience that Sarah has. Obama is the most hypocritical person and he has used the race card from the very beginning, as has his people.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Delete Post
Delete From Topic
The post will be removed from this topic completely
Skin and Language
Execution Stats
- Time Now: Jul 29 2010 12:30 PM


Help
Sign In »
Register Now!
Back to top
MultiQuote












